[PATCH v5 0/2] poweroff-source DT property renaming

[PATCH v5 0/2] poweroff-source DT property renaming

[Romain Perier]

The goal of this serie is to rename the property "poweroff-source" to
"system-power-controller". After discussions, it makes more sense to rename back
to the old established property name. This patches serie reverts
commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").

Changes since v4:
  - Renamed the helper function to of_device_is_system_power_controller
  - Removed changes in tps65910, as this commit will be removed from the mfd tree
  - Updated doc

Changes since v3:
  - Move backward compatibility from of_is_system_power_controller to
    tps65910, as it was only required for this driver.

Changes since v2:
  - of_is_system_power_controller is inline in of.h and only supports
    backward compatibility with device drivers which used this helper
    (which is tps65910)
  - Quashed all changes into a single patch (except documentation)
  - Add a separated commit to fix typos and mispellings in documentation

Changes since v1:

  - The first patch defines "of_is_system_power_controller" which is compatible
    with both "vendor,system-power-controller" and "system-power-controller"
    properties. Also, It keeps the old helper function of_system_has_poweroff_source
    for source compatibility until everything is renamed (in this way, bisections
    are not broken and change is made "atomically" between each commit)

    Note: the property "poweroff-source" itself is not used in dts files yet.
    Before this patch tps65910 was broken due to missing backward compatibility
    with "vendor,system-power-controller". As the old helper uses the new one,
    it works again.

  - act8865 and tps65910 are ported to the new helper function
  - The last commit removes the olf helper which was only used for source compatibility

Romain Perier (2):
  of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"
  dt-bindings: Update documentation for "system-power-controller" and
    fix misspellings

 .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt     | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt   | 18 ------------------
 .../bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt           |  4 ++--
 drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c                  |  2 +-
 include/linux/of.h                                     |  6 +++---
 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Romain Perier]

It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
the word "source" usually tends to be used for inputs and that is out of control
of the OS. The poweroff capability is an output which simply turns the
system-power off. Also, this property might be used by drivers which power-off
the system and power back on subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to
remove "poweroff" from the property name and to choose "system-power-controller"
as the more generic name. This patchs adds the required renaming changes and
defines an helper function which checks if this property is set.

Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
---
 .../bindings/power/{poweroff.txt => power-controller.txt}           | 0
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt   | 4 ++--
 drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c                               | 2 +-
 include/linux/of.h                                                  | 6 +++---
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/{poweroff.txt => power-controller.txt} (100%)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
similarity index 100%
rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt
rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt
index 01a5b07..dad6358 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
 - reg: I2C slave address
 
 Optional properties:
-- poweroff-source: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling
-  the system power. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt .
+- system-power-controller: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling
+  the system power. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt .
 
 Any standard regulator properties can be used to configure the single regulator.
 
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 76301ed..9eec453 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (of_system_has_poweroff_source(dev->of_node)) {
+	if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(dev->of_node)) {
 		if (!pm_power_off) {
 			act8865_i2c_client = client;
 			act8865->off_reg = off_reg;
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index b81dbcf..0abdd70 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -964,14 +964,14 @@ static inline int of_changeset_update_property(struct of_changeset *ocs,
 extern int of_resolve_phandles(struct device_node *tree);
 
 /**
- * of_system_has_poweroff_source - Tells if poweroff-source is found for device_node
+ * of_device_is_system_power_controller - Tells if system-power-controller is found for device_node
  * @np: Pointer to the given device_node
  *
  * return true if present false otherwise
  */
-static inline bool of_system_has_poweroff_source(const struct device_node *np)
+static inline bool of_device_is_system_power_controller(const struct device_node *np)
 {
-	return of_property_read_bool(np, "poweroff-source");
+	return of_property_read_bool(np, "system-power-controller");
 }
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_OF_H */
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Johan Hovold]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:28:25PM +0000, Romain Perier wrote:
> It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").
> As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
> old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
> the word "source" usually tends to be used for inputs and that is out of control
> of the OS. The poweroff capability is an output which simply turns the
> system-power off. Also, this property might be used by drivers which power-off
> the system and power back on subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to
> remove "poweroff" from the property name and to choose "system-power-controller"
> as the more generic name. This patchs adds the required renaming changes and
> defines an helper function which checks if this property is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>

Mark, this is for the regulator tree.

Thanks,
Johan

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Grant Likely]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:28:25 +0000
, Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
 wrote:
> It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").
> As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
> old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
> the word "source" usually tends to be used for inputs and that is out of control
> of the OS. The poweroff capability is an output which simply turns the
> system-power off. Also, this property might be used by drivers which power-off
> the system and power back on subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to
> remove "poweroff" from the property name and to choose "system-power-controller"
> as the more generic name. This patchs adds the required renaming changes and
> defines an helper function which checks if this property is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>

For both patches:
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>

Let me know if I need to take this series through my tree. Also, does it
need to go into v3.18 and be backported to stable? Or just v3.19.

g.

> ---
>  .../bindings/power/{poweroff.txt => power-controller.txt}           | 0
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt   | 4 ++--
>  drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c                               | 2 +-
>  include/linux/of.h                                                  | 6 +++---
>  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/{poweroff.txt => power-controller.txt} (100%)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
> similarity index 100%
> rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt
> rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt
> index 01a5b07..dad6358 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/act8865-regulator.txt
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ Required properties:
>  - reg: I2C slave address
>  
>  Optional properties:
> -- poweroff-source: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling
> -  the system power. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/poweroff.txt .
> +- system-power-controller: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling
> +  the system power. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt .
>  
>  Any standard regulator properties can be used to configure the single regulator.
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
> index 76301ed..9eec453 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (of_system_has_poweroff_source(dev->of_node)) {
> +	if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(dev->of_node)) {
>  		if (!pm_power_off) {
>  			act8865_i2c_client = client;
>  			act8865->off_reg = off_reg;
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index b81dbcf..0abdd70 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -964,14 +964,14 @@ static inline int of_changeset_update_property(struct of_changeset *ocs,
>  extern int of_resolve_phandles(struct device_node *tree);
>  
>  /**
> - * of_system_has_poweroff_source - Tells if poweroff-source is found for device_node
> + * of_device_is_system_power_controller - Tells if system-power-controller is found for device_node
>   * @np: Pointer to the given device_node
>   *
>   * return true if present false otherwise
>   */
> -static inline bool of_system_has_poweroff_source(const struct device_node *np)
> +static inline bool of_device_is_system_power_controller(const struct device_node *np)
>  {
> -	return of_property_read_bool(np, "poweroff-source");
> +	return of_property_read_bool(np, "system-power-controller");
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* _LINUX_OF_H */
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Dienstag, 25. November 2014, 14:40:07 schrieb Grant Likely:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:28:25 +0000
> , Romain Perier <romain.perier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
>  wrote:
> > It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff
> > capability"). As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to
> > rename back to the old established property name, without the vendor
> > prefix. Problem being that the word "source" usually tends to be used for
> > inputs and that is out of control of the OS. The poweroff capability is
> > an output which simply turns the system-power off. Also, this property
> > might be used by drivers which power-off the system and power back on
> > subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to remove "poweroff" from
> > the property name and to choose "system-power-controller" as the more
> > generic name. This patchs adds the required renaming changes and defines
> > an helper function which checks if this property is set.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> For both patches:
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Let me know if I need to take this series through my tree. Also, does it
> need to go into v3.18 and be backported to stable? Or just v3.19.

The original change [that is fixed now] is only scheduled for 3.19 and in
Mark Brown's tree [0]. So there shouldn't be anything to do for you now.


Heiko



[0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git/log/?h=topic/power-off
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Johan Hovold]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:40:07PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:28:25 +0000
> , Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> > It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").
> > As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
> > old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
> > the word "source" usually tends to be used for inputs and that is out of control
> > of the OS. The poweroff capability is an output which simply turns the
> > system-power off. Also, this property might be used by drivers which power-off
> > the system and power back on subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to
> > remove "poweroff" from the property name and to choose "system-power-controller"
> > as the more generic name. This patchs adds the required renaming changes and
> > defines an helper function which checks if this property is set.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
> 
> For both patches:
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> 
> Let me know if I need to take this series through my tree. Also, does it
> need to go into v3.18 and be backported to stable? Or just v3.19.

It's only needed in the regulator tree for 3.19, and does not need to be
backported.

We could convert the drivers (and dts) that currently use
"<vendor>,system-power-controller" to use the new helper (while
maintaining backward compatibility) after 3.19-rc1 is out.

Johan

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Romain Perier]

Thanks for your feedbacks.  I think that Mark will probably wait until
there are more reviews on this serie. (this is exactly what he asked
for the previous one)

2014-11-25 15:54 GMT+01:00 Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:40:07PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:28:25 +0000
>> , Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>> > It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").
>> > As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
>> > old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
>> > the word "source" usually tends to be used for inputs and that is out of control
>> > of the OS. The poweroff capability is an output which simply turns the
>> > system-power off. Also, this property might be used by drivers which power-off
>> > the system and power back on subsequent RTC alarms. This seems to suggest to
>> > remove "poweroff" from the property name and to choose "system-power-controller"
>> > as the more generic name. This patchs adds the required renaming changes and
>> > defines an helper function which checks if this property is set.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
>>
>> For both patches:
>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
>>
>> Let me know if I need to take this series through my tree. Also, does it
>> need to go into v3.18 and be backported to stable? Or just v3.19.
>
> It's only needed in the regulator tree for 3.19, and does not need to be
> backported.
>
> We could convert the drivers (and dts) that currently use
> "<vendor>,system-power-controller" to use the new helper (while
> maintaining backward compatibility) after 3.19-rc1 is out.
>
> Johan

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:57:56PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:

> Thanks for your feedbacks.  I think that Mark will probably wait until
> there are more reviews on this serie. (this is exactly what he asked
> for the previous one)

Yeah, given the amount of often late arriving disagreement I'd rather
let things cook for a while unless there are a lot of people being vocal
about this being what we want to go with.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] of: Rename "poweroff-source" property to "system-power-controller"

[Romain Perier]

2014-11-25 18:12 GMT+01:00 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>:
> Yeah, given the amount of often late arriving disagreement I'd rather
> let things cook for a while unless there are a lot of people being vocal
> about this being what we want to go with.

In other words, I need more reviews and more positives feedbacks about
this serie (as far as people who were against the previous ones).
For example, Feedbacks from Felipe Balbi and Lucas Stach would be welcome.

Thanks,
Romain

[PATCH v5 2/2] dt-bindings: Update documentation for "system-power-controller" and fix misspellings

[Romain Perier]

Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt   | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
index 845868b..4f7a3bc 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-controller.txt
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-* Generic Poweroff capability
+* Generic system power control capability
 
-Power-management integrated circuits or miscellaneous harware components are
-sometimes able to control the system power. The device driver associated to these
-components might needs to define poweroff capability, which tells to the kernel
-how to switch off the system. The corresponding driver must have the standard
-property "poweroff-source" in its device node. This property marks the device as
-able to shutdown the system. In order to test if this property is found
-programmatically, use the helper function "of_system_has_poweroff_source" from
-of.h .
+Power-management integrated circuits or miscellaneous hardware components are
+sometimes able to control the system power. The device driver associated with these
+components might need to define this capability, which tells the kernel that
+it can be used to switch off the system. The corresponding device must have the
+standard property "system-power-controller" in its device node. This property
+marks the device as able to control the system power. In order to test if this
+property is found programmatically, use the helper function
+"of_device_is_system_power_controller" from of.h .
 
 Example:
 
 act8846: act8846@5 {
 	 compatible = "active-semi,act8846";
 	 status = "okay";
-	 poweroff-source;
+	 system-power-controller;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] poweroff-source DT property renaming

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 480 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:28:24PM +0000, Romain Perier wrote:
> The goal of this serie is to rename the property "poweroff-source" to
> "system-power-controller". After discussions, it makes more sense to rename back
> to the old established property name. This patches serie reverts
> commit a4b4e0461ec5 ("of: Add standard property for poweroff capability").

> Changes since v4:
>   - Renamed the helper function to of_device_is_system_power_controller

Applied both, thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]