From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"khilman@linaro.org" <khilman@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"sboyd@codeaurora.org" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"msivasub@codeaurora.org" <msivasub@codeaurora.org>,
"galak@codeaurora.org" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/10] qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:52:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202155259.GF499@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141202111017.GC26306@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Tue, Dec 02 2014 at 04:10 -0700, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:57:05PM +0000, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 27 2014 at 08:01 -0700, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> >On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:24:07AM +0000, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >> +static int spm_set_low_power_mode(enum pm_sleep_mode mode)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct spm_driver_data *drv = per_cpu(cpu_spm_drv,
>> >> + smp_processor_id());
>> >> + u32 start_index;
>> >> + u32 ctl_val;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (!drv)
>> >> + return -ENXIO;
>> >> +
>> >> + start_index = drv->reg_data->start_index[mode];
>> >> +
>> >> + ctl_val = spm_register_read(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL);
>> >> + ctl_val &= ~(SPM_CTL_INDEX << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT);
>> >> + ctl_val |= start_index << SPM_CTL_INDEX_SHIFT;
>> >> + ctl_val |= SPM_CTL_EN;
>> >> + spm_register_write(drv, SPM_REG_SPM_CTL, ctl_val);
>> >> +
>> >> + /* Ensure we have written the start address */
>> >> + wmb();
>> >
>> >Can you explain please what this wmb is meant to achieve ? If it is there
>> >to make sure the write made it to the SPM that's not a proper way
>> >to achieve it, the barrier ensures ordering, not write completion.
>>
>> A write completion would be great, but assuming that the context switch
>> using SCM or WFI could ensure the flush, then ordering is probably good
>> enough for this.
>
>I assume you want the write to the device to complete (side-effects are
>observed) before the WFI (which would raise a StandbyWFI signal). The
>safer way is to read back from the device (or check/poll for the device
>state change) rather than a barrier.
Polling back to see if the register write was indeed successful, seems
a bit more than what I would like on a low latency mode like Standby.
Let me check with the hardware engineers, if a write ordering is
required. It seems to me like I am not getting much out of the wmb()
anyways. I will find out what kind of guarantees I would need to ensure
the SPM write is successful.
Thanks for your time, Catalin.
Thanks,
Lina.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 5:24 [PATCH v13 00/10] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 01/10] qcom: scm: Move scm-boot files to drivers/soc/qcom/ and include/soc/qcom Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 02/10] qcom: scm: Add SCM warmboot support for quad core SoCs Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 03/10] qcom: spm: Add Subsystem Power Manager driver Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 8:44 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2014-12-01 17:57 ` Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 8:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-12-01 18:50 ` Lina Iyer
2014-12-02 9:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-12-02 15:35 ` Lina Iyer
2014-12-02 15:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-11-27 15:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-12-01 18:57 ` Lina Iyer
2014-12-02 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-02 15:52 ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 04/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add power-controller device node for 8074 Krait CPUs Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 05/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add power-controller device node for 8084 " Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 06/10] arm: dts: qcom: Update power-controller device node for 8064 " Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 07/10] qcom: cpuidle: Add cpuidle driver for QCOM cpus Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 08/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add idle states device nodes for 8074 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 09/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add idle states device nodes for 8084 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 5:24 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] arm: dts: qcom: Add idle state device nodes for 8064 Lina Iyer
2014-11-27 8:53 ` [PATCH v13 00/10] cpuidle driver for QCOM SoCs: 8064, 8074, 8084 Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141202155259.GF499@linaro.org \
--to=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msivasub@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).