* Re: [PATCH V2 01/26] thermal: cpu_cooling: check for the readiness of cpufreq layer
2014-12-04 4:11 ` [PATCH V2 01/26] thermal: cpu_cooling: check for the readiness of cpufreq layer Viresh Kumar
@ 2014-12-04 14:08 ` Eduardo Valentin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Valentin @ 2014-12-04 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: linux-pm, linaro-kernel, rui.zhang, amit.daniel, javi.merino,
devicetree, Grant Likely, Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi,
Rob Herring
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7158 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:41:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
>
> In this patch, the cpu_cooling code checks for the usability of cpufreq
> layer before proceeding with the CPU cooling device registration. The
> main reason is: CPU cooling device is not usable if cpufreq cannot
> switch frequencies.
>
> Similar checks are spread in thermal drivers. Thus, the advantage now
> is to have the check in a single place: cpu cooling device registration.
> For this reason, this patch also updates the existing drivers that
> depend on CPU cooling to simply propagate the error code of the cpu
> cooling registration call. Therefore, in case cpufreq is not ready, the
> thermal drivers will still return -EPROBE_DEFER, in an attempt to try
> again when cpufreq layer gets ready.
>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c | 5 -----
> drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 5 -----
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.c | 8 +++++---
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 6 ------
> 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Here a simple update about the progress in this patch. This is V4 (not V2)
of this patch. Viresh and I agreed to include it in this series because the
patch is related to the fixes and cleanups in cpu cooling.
This version, on top of V3, has the error codes in the error messages,
as requested by Russel K. Viresh also insisted in having debug messages,
for debug purposes, when EPROBE_DEFER is used, which I did not oppose.
V3 is here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5405201/
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index ad09e51..f98a763 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -443,6 +443,11 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
> int ret = 0, i;
> struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>
> + if (!cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpumask_first(clip_cpus))) {
> + pr_debug("%s: CPUFreq table not found\n", __func__);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> + }
> +
> /* Verify that all the clip cpus have same freq_min, freq_max limit */
> for_each_cpu(i, clip_cpus) {
> /* continue if cpufreq policy not found and not return error */
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c
> index 786d192..1ac7ec6 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/db8500_cpufreq_cooling.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> -#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -30,10 +29,6 @@ static int db8500_cpufreq_cooling_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> struct cpumask mask_val;
>
> - /* make sure cpufreq driver has been initialized */
> - if (!cpufreq_frequency_get_table(0))
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -
> cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mask_val);
> cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(&mask_val);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> index 5a1f107..16405b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> -#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -459,10 +458,6 @@ static int imx_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int measure_freq;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!cpufreq_get_current_driver()) {
> - dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "no cpufreq driver!");
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - }
> data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data)
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.c
> index b6be572..50a1f17 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_thermal_common.c
> @@ -371,9 +371,11 @@ int exynos_register_thermal(struct thermal_sensor_conf *sensor_conf)
> th_zone->cool_dev[th_zone->cool_dev_size] =
> cpufreq_cooling_register(&mask_val);
> if (IS_ERR(th_zone->cool_dev[th_zone->cool_dev_size])) {
> - dev_err(sensor_conf->dev,
> - "Failed to register cpufreq cooling device\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + ret = PTR_ERR(th_zone->cool_dev[th_zone->cool_dev_size]);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(sensor_conf->dev,
> + "Failed to register cpufreq cooling device: %d\n",
> + ret);
> goto err_unregister;
> }
> th_zone->cool_dev_size++;
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 49c0924..2afca9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -683,7 +683,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Register the sensor with thermal management interface */
> ret = exynos_register_thermal(sensor_conf);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register thermal interface\n");
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Failed to register thermal interface: %d\n",
> + ret);
> goto err_clk;
> }
> data->reg_conf = sensor_conf;
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> index 9eec26d..5f07d7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/thermal.h>
> -#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -403,11 +402,6 @@ int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> if (!data)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!cpufreq_get_current_driver()) {
> - dev_dbg(bgp->dev, "no cpufreq driver yet\n");
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> - }
> -
> /* Register cooling device */
> data->cool_dev = cpufreq_cooling_register(cpu_present_mask);
> if (IS_ERR(data->cool_dev)) {
> --
> 2.0.3.693.g996b0fd
>
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread