From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Jiri Prchal <jiri.prchal@aksignal.cz>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/2] gpio: Document GPIO hogging mechanism
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:50:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141210225006.GA13407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVeFuJHwGqXSgCu-FstUr32UZJaKjSBAUkfySkQVFqUhV75JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote on Wed [2014-Dec-10 19:56:17 +0900]:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> wrote:
> > Add GPIO hogging documentation to gpio.txt
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > * Updated to the latest hog syntax.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Split the devicetree bindings documentation in its own patch.
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > index 3fb8f53..6d88133 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > @@ -103,6 +103,22 @@ Every GPIO controller node must contain both an empty "gpio-controller"
> > property, and a #gpio-cells integer property, which indicates the number of
> > cells in a gpio-specifier.
> >
> > +The GPIO chip may contain GPIO hog definitions. GPIO hogging is a mechanism
> > +providing automatic GPIO request and configuration as part of the
> > +gpio-controller's driver probe function.
> > +
> > +Each GPIO hog definition is represented as a child node of the GPIO controller.
> > +Required properties:
> > +- gpio-hog: A property specifying that this child node represent a gpio-hog.
> > +- gpios: Store the gpio information (id, flags, ...). Shall contain the
> > + number of cells specified in its parent node (GPIO controller
> > + node).
>
> Since this property will only describe one GPIO, why use the plural
> form? Would it not be confusing?
I would tend to agree in this case but based on this original comment from Linus on this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=138917388625221&w=2
where on 08/01/2014 10:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
> +Each GPIO hog definition is represented as a child node of the GPIO controller.
> +Required properties:
> +- gpio: store the gpio informations (id, flags, ...). Shall contain the
> + number of cells specified in its parent node (GPIO controller node).
This property is alway plural "gpios".
As long as everyone agree, I am fine with it.
>
> > +- direction: A property specifying the direction/value needed. This property
> > + can take the folowing values: input, output-high, output-low.
>
> nit: since this property not only describes the direction but also the
> (potential) value, I suggest to rename it to "state".
Since you are the one who suggested "direction" in the first place, as long as you agree with yourself :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 21:02 [Patch v3 0/2] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Benoit Parrot
2014-12-04 21:02 ` [Patch v3 1/2] " Benoit Parrot
2014-12-10 11:19 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-12-10 23:48 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-12-12 8:54 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-12-12 16:49 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-12-04 21:02 ` [Patch v3 2/2] gpio: Document " Benoit Parrot
2014-12-10 10:56 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-12-10 22:50 ` Benoit Parrot [this message]
2014-12-12 8:37 ` Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141210225006.GA13407@ti.com \
--to=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri.prchal@aksignal.cz \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=panto@antoniou-consulting.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).