From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: gpmi: Remove "We support only one NAND chip" from bindings doc Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:17:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20141217011757.GO9759@ld-irv-0074> References: <1417097929-17832-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <20141128014832.GA3113@localhost.localdomain> <54781DD5.5030801@denx.de> <20141129024047.GA5056@localhost.localdomain> <20141130065326.GB3608@norris-Latitude-E6410> <20141130154255.GB14834@localhost.localdomain> <547C3BB9.1010706@denx.de> <20141202003840.GA11370@shldeISGChi005.sh.intel.com> <547D6A0A.70409@denx.de> <20141203003542.GA7895@shldeISGChi005.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141203003542.GA7895@shldeISGChi005.sh.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+gldm-linux-mtd-36=gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Huang Shijie Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese , Huang Shijie , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:35:42AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:28:10AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > On 02.12.2014 01:38, Huang Shijie wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:58:17AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > >> On 30.11.2014 16:42, Huang Shijie wrote: > > >>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:53:26PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > >>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:40:50AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 08:01:41AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > >>>>>> On 28.11.2014 02:48, Huang Shijie wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:18:49PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > >>>>>>>> This sentence "We support only one NAND chip now" is not true any more. > > >>>>>>>> Multiple chips are supported. So lets remove this sentence to not > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The gpmi can only supports one chip. Of course, there are maybe two dies > > >>>>>>> in this single chip. [...] > If your test result can prove that the gpmi can support two chips. > > I can ack this patch. (I ever thought the gpmi needs an extra patch to > support the multiple chips) > > > > > > I even did not have enough time to test the "two chips on a die" case very carefully before > > > I left freescale. > > > > I see. Thanks for the hint. But this "two chips on a die" scenario did > > pass some basic tests, no? > yes. It passed the bonnie++ test. If there are no more concrete objections, I'll apply this patch. Brian ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/