From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: fec: fix MDIO bus assignement for dual fec SoC's Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:42:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20150113114253.GC19355@dragon> References: <1420812103-5865-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Agner Cc: fugang.duan@freescale.com, davem@davemloft.net, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, "LW@KARO-electronics.de" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Bhuvanchandra DV List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:47:44AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2015-01-12 03:45, fugang.duan@freescale.com wrote: > > In additional, it is better to split the patch to two part with dts > > and driver part. > > Hm, this would mandate to have the device tree with the MDIO/phy-handle > changes merged before the net changes to maintain bisect-ability. > > @Dave/Shawn, what do you prefer? I'm fine with dts change in the driver patch, if we have a good reason for doing that. Shawn