From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add L2 cache topology to ARM Ltd boards/models Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:48:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20150121154828.GG6358@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1542574.d99bFx24pn@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1542574.d99bFx24pn@wuerfel> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Sudeep Holla , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Liviu Dudau , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:43:23PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 21 January 2015 12:02:30 Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Though this patch and commit 5d425c18653731af6 ("arm64: kernel: add > > support for cpu cache information") which is in -next(via arm64) are > > dependent to provide desired functionality, then can go indepedently > > if you think there could be conflicts if this change is taken via arm64. > > If not, Catalin can pick up with your acks after the review. > > I think it would be better to take this through arm-soc. It's not > extremely likely to cause conflicts, but as you say there are no > strict dependencies on which goes in first, so there is no harm > in merging them separately. Fine by me. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html