From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: i2c-st: Rename clock reference to something
 that exists
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:54:40 +0000
Message-ID: <20150122145440.GD9129@x1>
References: <1409234523-20240-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20150122121819.GC9129@x1>
 <20150122141427.GA3413@katana>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150122141427.GA3413@katana>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Wolfram,
> >=20
> > This patch has been on the list since forever.
>=20
> For reasons :)
>=20
> a) It was not CCed to the i2c list, so it doesn't show up in patchwor=
k
> which does the patch tracking for me.
>=20
> b) I was always under the impression that Maxime is going to take it?
> He said so.
>=20
> > I have Acks from the driver author, so I'm going to take this throu=
gh
> > the MFD tree.  If you perk up later and decide to take it though th=
e
> > I2C tree instead, let me know and I'll remove it from MFD.
>=20
> Well, I2C makes more sense than MFD, so I'll pick it up right now.
> ST-tree would have also been fine.

Works for me.  Thanks dude.

--=20
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs
=46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog