From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Linn Ethernet Packet Sniffer driver Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:53:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20150127105353.GC17721@leverpostej> References: <1422007621-13567-1-git-send-email-stathis.voukelatos@linn.co.uk> <20150123105114.GB23493@leverpostej> <54C613F2.5090507@linn.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C613F2.5090507@linn.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stathis Voukelatos Cc: Stathis Voukelatos , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "abrestic@chromium.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:16:18AM +0000, Stathis Voukelatos wrote: > > On 23/01/15 10:51, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/linn-ether-packet-sniffer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/linn-ether-packet-sniffer.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..6b6e105 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/linn-ether-packet-sniffer.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > > +* Linn Products Ethernet Packet Sniffer > > + > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible : must be "linn,eth-sniffer" > > +- reg : physical addresses and sizes of registers. Must contain 3 entries: > > + first entry: registers memory space > > + second entry: TX command memory > > + third entry: RX command memory > > Just to check: are those memories are part of the packet sniffer device, > > or are carveouts from other memory? > Yes, the 3 memory areas are part of the packet sniffer module. > >> +- fifo-block-words : number of words in one data FIFO entry > >> + > >> +Example: > >> + > >> +sniffer@1814a000 { > >> + compatible = "linn,eth-sniffer"; > >> + reg = <0x1814a000 0x100>, <0x1814a400 0x400>, <0x1814a800 0x400>; > >> + reg-names = "regs", "tx-ram", "rx-ram"; > >> + interrupts = ; > >> + interrupt-names = "eth-sniffer-irq"; > >> + clocks = <&system_clk>; > >> + clock-names = "sys"; > >> + fifo-block-words = <4>; > >> + }; > > Surely the relationship between the sniffer, MAC, and PHY should be > > described, so we know which interface the sniffer is related to? > > > The packet sniffer sits between the MAC and the PHY and monitors TX or RX > packets, or both. Will add a description in the binding doc. I understood that. However the binding does not explicitly refer to either of those, so I don't see how you'd associate this sniffer instance with the relevant PHY+MAC instances. That should be made explicit in the binding. Mark.