From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] Imagination Technologies PWM support Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:18:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20150130091832.GA16744@ulmo> References: <1420826088-13113-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com> <54BE3369.9000802@imgtec.com> <54CA6089.50505@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CA6089.50505@imgtec.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Andrew Bresticker , James Hartley , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 01:32:09PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 01/20/2015 07:52 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > On 01/09/2015 02:54 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> A new round for the IMG PWM driver. > >> > >> The IMG PWM controller is muxed with a PDM controller, through a shared > >> so-called periph register bit, which sets the output as PWM or PDM. > >> Because this register is not part of the pin controller block, but rat= her > >> PWM/PDM specific, and because the register is also used to set the PDM= value, > >> it is simpler to use a regmap-based syscon to deal with it. > >> > >> This time, I'm removing the PDM driver from the submission and submitt= ing the PWM > >> alone. The PDM was written as a misc driver, but had some design issue= s, so for > >> now I'm proposing to merge the PWM only. > >> > >> The series is based on v3.19-rc3. If at all possible I'd like to see t= his merged > >> for v3.20. > >> > >=20 > > Thierry, > >=20 > > Any comments on this? Any chance we merge it in time for v3.20? > > It's -rc5 already and I've started to worry. > >=20 >=20 > Thierry, >=20 > I'm very sorry to be so bothering, but I got no news from you and it's > -rc6 already. I'd say I'll resend this series to Andrew Morton, hoping > we can merge this for v3.20. >=20 > Please let me know if you'll be able to pick this. I can pick it up if you make up your mind about the license. The header comment says GPL v2 or later, but MODULE_LICENSE has "GPL v2", which does not include the "or later" part. Also you're making it especially difficult to build-test by not providing even the basic bits of your SoC support first. All even linux-next seems to have for the Pistachio SoC is the addition of a compatible string to the dw-mmc driver. I'll take the PWM driver, but I'll assume that you'll eventually have more pieces available, in which case I'd appreciate a note so I can update my build scripts. Thierry --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUy0xoAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhdzoP/iosFdE7SURQFvDGWxobalW6 42R7DJoSETupb3iPxqOoEj3kNB64jMTzzbbmW70i8TqCdNlLIqHvVZsVD72pKLvW 0KP2bdX2jLDYd2RJNRdsHsJ5elFCHGDnQ+/lABobGTPatCirmMUasoVCcMvj9Z6s UICKi+Y9kalbj5DDaqIU1RcTpqxAlAWSeRSTd8uS+twhxYjhNkw6S4PcCBf3+tDn nCK0w7yO43hi5qoGaecfrb0TyYE37MqTGfxinHH8203s/uckfR6sRtwnMKNLcnmQ L3Q89nmrG4rPmeZ1siwILqmPArUBwn6LfEc1Fhj9KSoZjNCknQtG1xPXWTxjKiry zhU/Q9GFiY+KqTV24hqjCsYAOKAxZto9hp1Gqa+HECTfWJ8Y/aiRIsZB3qC+7372 pPeHt11LTQ+SyJz98I5cUoIJFuxquCNlxkY0lQsdmQA+3iGC0kexOY0oPHOaO8Zk TfbUU0drpPR1Aww2d1v3ENWWTIDSyCIEqx+3hMiVW3Dt/Fkbd/ujdN34G7PXhorT hbWFTYTTShnETHB06y28OmGJjvO4nCGH3r6c0lbegGzCqyyqaZ6xANQOJBBJ4zWv sUeNbCrbcQSZVrH/fINtaioibEiJxHJ113VJgkX7BmtEXFthjQLzXKQOUHSj+mcP bPS2jP5mhoH0Rzm/h7Mg =sI1E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--