From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm: am33xx: DT quirks for am33xx based beaglebone variants Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:57:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20150219185756.GA8611@roeck-us.net> References: <1424271576-1952-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <1424271576-1952-4-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <20150219181656.GF32521@atomide.com> <9C7BFC7C-0751-4233-927F-D01AF078704B@antoniou-consulting.com> <20150219183600.GG32521@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150219183600.GG32521@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , Grant Likely , Matt Porter , Koen Kooi , Ludovic Desroches , Rob Herring , Nicolas Ferre , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:36:00AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pantelis Antoniou [150219 10:32]: > > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:16 , Tony Lindgren wrot= e: > > >=20 > > > Uhh I don't like the idea of duplicating the i2c-omap.c driver un= der > > > arch/arm.. And in general we should initialize things later rathe= r > > > than earlier. > > >=20 > > > What's stopping doing these quirk checks later on time with just > > > a regular device driver, something like drivers/misc/bbone-quirks= =2Ec? > > >=20 > >=20 > > We have no choice; we are way early in the boot process, right afte= r > > the device tree unflattening step. >=20 > To me it seems the dt patching part should be done with minimal > code before any driver like features.. > =20 > > I=E2=80=99ve toyed with the idea of using early platform devices bu= t the omap-i2c driver > > would need some tender love and care to make it work, and I didn=E2= =80=99t want to get > > bogged down with i2c driver details at this point. >=20 > ..so how about just parse a kernel cmdline for the quirks to apply > based on a version string or similar? That can be easily populated > by u-boot or set manually with setenv. >=20 That would not work for my use case. Again, this is a CPU card plugged into a carrier card, of which there are several variants. The CPU card is similar to a Com Express card (not exactly the same, but the same idea), so it may even be manufactured by a third party. Actually, in some cases it is. Modifying the kernel command line based on the carrier card it is connected to is simply not possible. Guenter