From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: fix virtual irq demuxer related comments Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:12:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20150220161259.GL13659@leverpostej> References: <20150210150013.GD7119@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1423582992-8154-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150210161425.GZ21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150210161425.GZ21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra , Boris Brezillon Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Alexandre Belloni , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:14:25PM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:43:12PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Replace remaining 'Dumb' occurrences by 'Virtual'. > > Remove inappropriate notes in kerneldoc headers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > Thanks, squished into the other one. Would you be able to drop the virtual demuxer patch(es) for now? The fundamental problem here is that a physical IRQ is shared by wakeup and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND handlers. Neither the virtual demuxer nor the flag approach solve that problem. Boris and I have spoken on IRC and have some ideas as to what we could do, but no code just yet. Thanks, Mark.