Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: dts: Update compatible field description for APM X-Gene

[Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>]

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:58:28PM +0000, Iyappan Subramanian wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:08:28PM +0000, Iyappan Subramanian wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@apm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Keyur Chudgar <kchudgar@apm.com>
> >> Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/apm-xgene-enet.txt | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/apm-xgene-enet.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/apm-xgene-enet.txt
> >> index cfcc527..5355996 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/apm-xgene-enet.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/apm-xgene-enet.txt
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ Ethernet nodes are defined to describe on-chip ethernet interfaces in
> >>  APM X-Gene SoC.
> >>
> >>  Required properties for all the ethernet interfaces:
> >> -- compatible: Should be "apm,xgene-enet"
> >> +- compatible: Should be "apm,xgene-enet", "apm,xgene1-sgenet" or
> >> +  "apm,xgene1-xgenet"
> >
> > Please format this as a list. It'll be easier to read, and you can add
> > more later.
> 
> Thanks.  I will do that.
> 
> >
> > What are the diffences between these variants?
> 
> apm,xgene-enet - binding for RGMII based 1G interface
> apm,xgene1-sgenet - binding for SGMII based 1G interface
> apm,xgene1-xgenet - binding for XFI based 10G interface

I see. If you could keep notes to this effect in the list, that would
help to keep this obvious.

Thanks,
Mark.