From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Nicolas FERRE
<nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Boris BREZILLON
<boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150306170708.GR3989@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AB034DC5-9E4C-4883-BBF0-B93B438C7A54-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 07/03/2015 at 00:49:55 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
> >
> > Sorry but NACK.
> >
> > I don't want to manage another flavor of the pinmux biding with no real
> > benefit. I would have been good if we had it from day-1. Now it's too late.
>
> yes we do, we catch but a compiling time instead of RUNTIME which is critical
>
> so I’ll pass on the NACK
>
If you are changing the binding, how about doing it right this time and
completely drop the current mess?
> >
> > Moreover, splitting a binding definition if you have a function given by
> > multiple banks can be weird and not well understood in regard to our
> > current group+function definition scheme (Cf. your last example).
> >
>
> Others already do so and this is not complex at all
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 9:34 [PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
[not found] ` <1424943294-8805-1-git-send-email-plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-26 10:43 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-02-26 11:03 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-06 15:08 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-06 16:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
[not found] ` <AB034DC5-9E4C-4883-BBF0-B93B438C7A54-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-06 17:07 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-03-06 18:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-03-06 18:33 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-17 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-29 20:55 ` Olof Johansson
2015-04-02 8:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150306170708.GR3989@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).