From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] touchscreen: sun4i-ts: A10 (sun4i) has a different temperature curve Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:11:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20150308211117.GA23193@dtor-ws> References: <1425848022-18001-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1425848022-18001-1-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Hans de Goede Cc: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, Eduardo Valentin List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Hans, On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 09:53:39PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi Dmitry, Maxime, et al. > > Here is a patch-set for the sun4i-ts driver temperature sensor support, > it consists of 2 fixes: > > 1) Use a better temperature curve for A10 SoCs to avoid reporting a way to > high temperature. > > 2) Start with reporting an "estimated" temperature of 40 degrees rather then > returning -EAGAIN until we get the first temperature ready interrupt to avoid > the kernel tempzone core logging errors because of our -EAGAIN return. No, I think we better teach thermal core not to complain about -EAGAINs. > > Dmitry can you please queue up the 2 sun4i-ts patches for 4.1, and Maxime, > can you please queue up the matching dts change ? > > Thanks & Regards, > > Hans -- Dmitry