From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Replace cpu_suspend by the common ARM/ARM64 function Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:21:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20150313182102.GS30671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1425385777-14766-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1425385777-14766-4-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:29:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Call the common ARM/ARM64 'arm_cpuidle_suspend' instead of cpu_suspend function > which is specific to ARM64. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c > index 39a2c62..0cea244 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm64.c > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int arm64_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a > * parameter. > */ > - ret = cpu_suspend(idx); > + arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx); Nitpick: why don't we just rename the arm one cpuidle_suspend()? -- Catalin