From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dt: dove: add Dove PMU DT entry to dove.dtsi Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:15:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20150317151555.GX8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150312183020.GU8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <55072092.9040207@free-electrons.com> <20150317134335.GV8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <5508439F.4000507@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5508439F.4000507-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > If we do this, we should have a look at syscon and potentially also > simple-mfd which will allow us to share the registers and register > platform_devices for the sub-nodes. > > The current pmu power/reset/irq can still use the extra locking > and directly access MMIO registers - but for the others we should > really look into using regmaps. > > The only thing here is that power domain descriptions are also encoded > as direct sub-nodes of the pmu node, right? Yes, I've been debating about putting those under a domains { } sub-node, like we do with the ports { } sub-node for of-graph stuff. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html