From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] arm64: dts: exynos: Add dts files for 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:35:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20150402173558.GB30669@leverpostej> References: <1426637856-3730-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <1426637856-3730-2-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <20150330160940.GA13731@leverpostej> <5519E2B6.2030905@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5519E2B6.2030905@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: "kgene@kernel.org" , Marc Zyngier , "arnd@arndb.de" , "olof@lixom.net" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "inki.dae@samsung.com" , "chanho61.park@samsung.com" , "sw0312.kim@samsung.com" , "jh80.chung@samsung.com" , "ideal.song@samsung.com" , "a.kesavan@samsung.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:56:38AM +0100, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 03/31/2015 01:09 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:17:28AM +0000, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >> This patch adds new Exynos5433 dtsi to support 64-bit Exynos5433 SoC based on > >> Octal core CPUs (quad Cortex-A57 and quad Cortex-A53). And Exynos5433 supports > >> PSCI (Power State Coordination Interface) v0.1. > >> > >> This patch includes following dt node to support Exynos5433 SoC: > >> 1. Octa core for big.LITTLE architecture > >> - Cortex-A53 LITTLE Quad-core > >> - Cortex-A57 big Quad-core > >> - Support PSCI v0.1 > > > > Is CPU0 hotplug still broken, or has the FW been fixed? > > CPU0 hotplug is still not working. > > > > > I'm very worried about adding a DT that's known broken, especially when > > we have no idea as to if/when the FW will be fixed judging from prior > > replies. > > As I replied, I can not fix the FW because I don't have any code of FW. Surely you are able to contact those who do? > I don't have any solution to fix it on Linux kernel level. > > So, If you agree, I can add the comment of CPU0 hotplug issue on DT file. I disagree. I do not want to add a DT that is known to be broken; especially when we have no idea how to fix it. It creates long-term maintenance pain for everyone, and marginal gain for few. A comment does nothing to aid the end-user. So NAK to the PSCI node and PSCI enable method in this dts until we either have a working firmware, or a reasonable mechanism to handle the deficiency. Mark.