Re: [PATCH/RFC v13 04/13] DT: Add documentation for the mfd Maxim max77693

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:

> On Mon 2015-03-23 15:59:37, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon 2015-03-23 15:02:13, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > On Mon 2015-03-23 12:07:43, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > This patch requires a DT Ack.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No, it requires DT people to be notified -- and they were, few times
> > > > > by now.
> > > > > 
> > > > > They clearly don't care.
> > > > 
> > > > Well fortunately for the Kernel community, I do care.  And as this
> > > > patch adds 3 new DT properties, has been through many iterations
> > > > already with vast changes made over that period and there is still
> > > > some controversy looming, I'm saying that it _does_ require a DT
> > > > Ack.
> > > 
> > > Can you help get that ack, then? As a maintainer, you have better
> > > chance getting reply from DT people than patch submitter.
> > 
> > Hopefully they will see my plea a couple of replies back.
> > 
> > If that fails I'll go poke them via other means.  Failing that I'll go
> > see them in person and continually hit them with wet fish until one of
> > them relents.
> 
> Can I request footage of the last steps on the youtube?

Too late, it's been and gone.

> (IOW ping, I don't think I seen any replies from DT maintainers...)

Then you haven't been looking the right place [1]. ;)

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.leds/2245

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog