Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arm: tegra: implement NVEC driver using tegrai2c.

[Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 947 bytes --]


> One thing where we need your help as a I2C maintainer is how to represent an 
> i2c slave device using device-tree. You may remember our discussion in the 
> past from here [1] where you suggested to just make a slave client by its 
> compatible name. Stephen Warren from NVIDIA raised some concerns about this 
> solution because it may not be appropriate in all possible future cases (which 
> is what a proper device-tree representation should take care off). He instead 
> suggested to mark a slave client by adding some flag to the reg property, to 
> be able to handle a situation where both master client and slave client have 
> the same i2c bus address forming a loopback (e.g. for testing purpose) on the 
> same bus. More details here [2].
> 
> I hope with this post I can join the different discussions somehow so we are 
> able to find a common sense which is acceptable for all.

I'll have a look again for 4.2.


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]