From: Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@ni.com>
To: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@xilinx.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
rob@landley.net, michal.simek@xilinx.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jason@lakedaemon.net, ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com,
arnd@arndb.de, dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com, jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi,
acourbot@nvidia.com, ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com, joern@logfs.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
kpc528@gmail.com, kalluripunnaiahchoudary@gmail.com,
Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] memory: pl353: Add driver for arm pl353 static memory controller
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:11:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150428151138.GB11721@bshelton-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1f437fe-51cf-4a89-87b4-8f0a305e68ed@BN1AFFO11FD026.protection.gbl>
Hi Punnaiah,
> +/**
> + * pl353_smc_set_cycles - Set memory timing parameters
> + * @dev: Pointer to the device struct
> + * @t0: t_rc read cycle time
> + * @t1: t_wc write cycle time
> + * @t2: t_rea/t_ceoe output enable assertion delay
> + * @t3: t_wp write enable deassertion delay
> + * @t4: t_clr/t_pc page cycle time
> + * @t5: t_ar/t_ta ID read time/turnaround time
> + * @t6: t_rr busy to RE timing
> + *
> + * Sets NAND chip specific timing parameters.
> + */
> +void pl353_smc_set_cycles(struct device *dev, u32 t0, u32 t1, u32 t2, u32 t3,
> + u32 t4, u32 t5, u32 t6)
> +{
> + struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + t0 &= PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T0_MASK;
> + t1 = (t1 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T1_MASK) <<
> + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T1_SHIFT;
> + t2 = (t2 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T2_MASK) <<
> + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T2_SHIFT;
> + t3 = (t3 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T3_MASK) <<
> + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T3_SHIFT;
> + t4 = (t4 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T4_MASK) <<
> + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T4_SHIFT;
> + t5 = (t5 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T5_MASK) <<
> + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T5_SHIFT;
> + t6 = (t6 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T6_MASK) <<
> + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T6_SHIFT;
Right now, if the caller (i.e. the PL353 NAND driver) passes in a value for any
of the timing parameters that is too large, it will be truncated with the
corresponding mask and then saved, resulting in unexpected behavior. I saw
this when the PL353 NAND driver tried to set t_rc and t_wc to 17 cycles, which
does not fit in the 4-bit fields for those values -- it got clipped to 4 bits
and stored as 1 cycle, which made communication with the NAND chip fail and
time out.
It would be good to sanity-check each timing here, and rather than returning
void, return a return code indicating success or failure (e.g. -EINVAL for
invalid timings).
Note also that truncation isn't the only thing to check for here. The PL350
r2p1 datasheet lists a "Minimum permitted value" for each of these timing
values.
> +
> + t0 |= t1 | t2 | t3 | t4 | t5 | t6;
> +
> + writel(t0, pl353_smc->base + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_OFFS);
> + writel(PL353_SMC_DC_UPT_NAND_REGS, pl353_smc->base +
> + PL353_SMC_DIRECT_CMD_OFFS);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_set_cycles);
> +
Thanks,
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1428941512-26411-1-git-send-email-punnaia@xilinx.com>
2015-04-13 16:11 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Devicetree: Add pl353 smc controller devicetree binding information Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
2015-04-23 19:50 ` Josh Cartwright
2015-04-24 0:46 ` Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
2015-04-13 16:11 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] memory: pl353: Add driver for arm pl353 static memory controller Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri
2015-04-13 18:49 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-14 6:44 ` punnaiah choudary kalluri
2015-04-28 15:11 ` Ben Shelton [this message]
2015-04-28 15:58 ` punnaiah choudary kalluri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150428151138.GB11721@bshelton-desktop \
--to=ben.shelton@ni.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi \
--cc=kalluripunnaiahchoudary@gmail.com \
--cc=kpc528@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=punnaia@xilinx.com \
--cc=punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@xilinx.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox