From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: bt-sco: Add devicetree support for bt-sco codec Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 13:13:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20150506121311.GP22845@sirena.org.uk> References: <1430856941-3938-1-git-send-email-marek@goldelico.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lSMnNQgKosWEEuky" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1430856941-3938-1-git-send-email-marek@goldelico.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Belisko Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, hns@goldelico.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --lSMnNQgKosWEEuky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Marek Belisko wrote: > +static const struct of_device_id bt_sco_codec_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "delta,dfbmcs320", }, > + { .compatible = "linux,bt-sco", }, Is there any burning reason for adding the linux,bt-sco compatible? --lSMnNQgKosWEEuky Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVSgVWAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQb2oH/j0vdyRU3yfYXdR14YhTiDjX QgfNgov7nxWrlEdOTfcHbyeijldQsPUfur4Wdks/kAxhAelNAqrgcXj3DcXj4hWm xRGXTG//cIxGKHYhO3CpS3yVMT2t1f2aLkLH1KgT/7uPjMQdLGstza122fZ8rgpK dAfSy5Tyc7+AW5Nl46ou2cxbGV+4eR56tpMbdBIc1AIiAqZA+2XKjeyJEJopYhoA n2Vz7xV9R1rV0l1nGMs/Y2OT4jTyX2Etpl0haasJ8gcyxUjbe9ZaimqHE9cnkchd Z5UIlhDkU+q/MxnL4hktjjVkyuTHrnCaGR/MqNrHmuu9TUqgQrFEyuTZrWSELtA= =lfws -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lSMnNQgKosWEEuky--