From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 14:22:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20150506122200.GE11057@lukather> References: <1430904693-1404-1-git-send-email-jenskuske@gmail.com> <1430904693-1404-2-git-send-email-jenskuske@gmail.com> <20150506100446.GA11057@lukather> <5549EBB5.8040806@gmail.com> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5549EBB5.8040806-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Jens Kuske Cc: Emilio =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=F3pez?= , Mike Turquette , Linus Walleij , Vinod Koul , Rob Herring , Chen-Yu Tsai , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:23:49PM +0200, Jens Kuske wrote: > On 06/05/15 12:04, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:31:28AM +0200, Jens Kuske wrote: > >> The Allwinner H3 is a quad-core Cortex-A7-based SoC. It is very similar > >> to other sun8i family SoCs like the A23. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jens Kuske > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt | 1 + > >> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 3 ++- > >> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt > >> index 42941fd..3cb4b94 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt > >> @@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ using one of the following compatible strings: > >> allwinner,sun6i-a31 > >> allwinner,sun7i-a20 > >> allwinner,sun8i-a23 > >> + allwinner,sun8i-h3 > >> allwinner,sun9i-a80 > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> index 81502b9..47ac5b4 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > >> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config MACH_SUN7I > >> select SUN5I_HSTIMER > >> > >> config MACH_SUN8I > >> - bool "Allwinner A23 (sun8i) SoCs support" > >> + bool "Allwinner A23 / H3 (sun8i) SoCs support" > > > > I'd prefer that we have something similar to sun9i, just mentionning > > the family here, instead of an ever-growing list of SoCs. > > > > This used to be easy to maintain, with the new naming scheme, we > > already have at least 4 SoCs part of sun8i. > > According to Allwinners new naming scheme A20/A31/A31s are also part of > sun8i (sun8iw[1,2]), but I think we can agree to use sun8i for the new > SoCs, starting from A23. Yep, we can't really change the family half-way, and using sun8i for the newer SoCs (A23, A33, A83, H3, V*, etc.) works just as well. -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --k3qmt+ucFURmlhDS--