From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:11:29 +0530 Message-ID: <20150513044129.GC28858@linux> References: <555225A0.8050707@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <555225A0.8050707@ti.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Rafael Wysocki , rob.herring@linaro.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, olof@lixom.net, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, khilman@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12-05-15, 11:09, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 04/30/2015 07:08 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > (sort of an eeprom) and knowing characteristics of the SoC. > > they are more like prom than eeprom in many instances. Will replace. > With some SoCs like AM335x - thanks to some brain dead incompatible > hardware design choices, this might end up as a big list or various > OPP tables. but overall, I must prefer this approach as well. > > Thanks for proposing this. will be great to see examples documented in > bindings doc as well. Right. -- viresh