From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:15:09 +0530 Message-ID: <20150513044509.GD28858@linux> References: <20150512161945.GE8699@saruman.tx.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150512161945.GE8699@saruman.tx.rr.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Rafael Wysocki , rob.herring@linaro.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, nm@ti.com, broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com, olof@lixom.net, khilman@linaro.org, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12-05-15, 11:19, Felipe Balbi wrote: > operating-points-v2 is kinda awkward, how about > operating-points-extended, much like interrupts-extended ? What about the next version if required ? :) > Other than this, I very much like the new approach. Thanks. -- viresh