From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:52:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20150520005207.GQ31753@codeaurora.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Rafael Wysocki , rob.herring@linaro.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, nm@ti.com, broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, olof@lixom.net, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, khilman@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/30, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On some platforms (Like Qualcomm's SoCs), it is not decided until > runtime on what OPPs to use. The OPP tables can be fixed at compile > time, but which table to use is found out only after reading some efuses > (sort of an eeprom) and knowing characteristics of the SoC. > > To support such platform we need to pass multiple OPP tables per device > and hardware should be able to choose one and only one table out of > those. > > Update OPP-v2 bindings to support that. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project