From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:55:28 +0530 Message-ID: <20150526052528.GA26445@linux> References: <20150512214224.16410.15922@quantum> <20150513085528.GA6994@linux> <555D750F.80304@ti.com> <20150522140457.GB7730@linux> <555F6A8B.9010407@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <555F6A8B.9010407@ti.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Rob Herring , Thomas Petazzoni , Rob Herring , Abhilash Kesavan , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Viswanath Puttagunta , Stephen Boyd , Mark Brown , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Rafael Wysocki , Grant Likely , Kevin Hilman , Michael Turquette , Sudeep Holla , Olof Johansson , Lucas Stach , Santosh Shilimkar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 22-05-15, 12:42, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Yes, ofcourse... it is always an option, we just tend to like to have > all data in the same place if possible - DT is the preferred approach. If we are done, may I send the next version incorporating your suggestions ? -- viresh