From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Move PWM nodes STiH407 => STiH407-family Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:08:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20150623070822.GB3245@x1> References: <1434987837-24212-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1434987837-24212-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150623021708.GB16776@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150623021708.GB16776@linux> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@st.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 22-06-15, 16:43, Lee Jones wrote: > > This also incorporates the STiH410. >=20 > Any explanation to why this patch is part of this series ? Because the CPUFreq regulator is controlled with PWM and CPUFreq will fail on STiH410 (my main development platform) without it. It's safe for you to ignore it though. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in