From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm: add call to CPU idle quirks handler
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:27:11 +0100
Message-ID: <20150626222710.GU7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1435094387-20146-1-git-send-email-pawelo@king.net.pl>
 <alpine.LFD.2.11.1506251237000.2617@knanqh.ubzr>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1506260715300.499@localhost.localdomain>
 <2139691.3OPR29uKdT@wuerfel>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1506262324230.5744@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1506262324230.5744-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Paul Osmialowski <pawelo-rhuoMcPwk82rDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org>, Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= <kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, Anson Huang <b20788-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>, Jingchang Lu <jingchang.lu-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>, Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>, Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Magnus Damm <damm+renesas-yzvPICuk2ACczHhG9Qg4qA@public.gmane.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Nathan
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:52:23PM +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
> I tried it and it works. This approach does not cause code duplication, but
> (comparing to arm_pm_idle-based approach) its long. Would something like
> this be accepted ever?
> 
> Note that contrary to proc-v7, there's no __v7m_proc macro, I had to define
> it in order to avoid another code duplication:

And I don't like it - until we have word from Uwe, I'd like to keep this
simple and restricted just to the affected SoC.  Until we have it proven
that this is a generic problem, we shouldn't go treating it as such.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html