From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Timo Sigurdsson" Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:45:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20150728144528.E3A916C82F6B@dd34104.kasserver.com> References: <1437960486-2809-1-git-send-email-public_timo.s@silentcreek.de> <55B5E6DB.8020009@redhat.com> <20150727120918.191F76C82FB4@dd34104.kasserver.com> <55B62768.6040403@redhat.com><20150728124911.GA2564@lukather> Reply-To: public_timo.s-fWgRPtSzPNU3WX+qO2AYSQ@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150728124911.GA2564@lukather> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, Maxime Ripard schrieb am 28.07.2015 14:49: > I don't feel like holding patches that were posted before you did > because you did them some time ago and never submitted them is > reasonnable and / or encouraging for new submitters of patches. > > I'd really like to get more sunxi-people contributing, and that starts > with that kind of trivial stuff. Holding them back because one of the > usual (and experienced) developpers is a bit counter-productive (and > I'm sure you still have a lot of patches to submit anyway ;)). Just for the record: I wouldn't be discouraged by that. The only thing that matters to me here is that regulator support will be added, regardless of who submitted the patch. But anyway, I will rework the patch along the statements made during this discussion. Regards, Timo