From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] edac: Add L3/SoC support to the APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:43:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20150730074316.GB8984@nazgul.tnic> References: <1437808063-17592-1-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1437808063-17592-2-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1437808063-17592-3-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <20150729142941.GC17367@nazgul.tnic> <20150730043148.GC7209@nazgul.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Loc Ho Cc: Doug Thompson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , linux-edac-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Jon Masters , "patches-qTEPVZfXA3Y@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:31:49PM -0700, Loc Ho wrote: > Let me clarify a bit. I have one top level driver node and multiple > instance of subnodes - 4 MC, 4 L2/L1, 1 L3C, and 1 SoC EDAC for now. > The L3C many be multiple instance in the future. Just a note, the way > EDAC looks up instance is by pointer of struct device. It doesn't need > anything more than that. That's not what I mean - I mean all those instances calling into the EDAC core concurrently without any locking. From a quick scan, nothing problematic sticks out but it needs careful auditing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html