Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: ath79: add irq chip ar7240-misc-intc

[Alban <albeu-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu,  6 Aug 2015 12:43:25 +0200
Alexander Couzens <lynxis-qyMx1GtpvWw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> The ar7240 misc irq chip use ack handler instead of ack_mask handler.
> All new ath79 SoCs use the ar7240 misc irq chip

except the ar913x family according to the later documentation.

[...]

> --- a/arch/mips/ath79/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/ath79/irq.c
> @@ -315,8 +315,17 @@ static int __init ar7100_misc_intc_of_init(
>  	return ath79_misc_intc_of_init(node, parent);
>  }
>  
> +static int __init ar7240_misc_intc_of_init(
> +	struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	ath79_misc_irq_chip.irq_ack = ar724x_misc_irq_ack;
> +	return ath79_misc_intc_of_init(node, parent);
> +}
> +
>  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ar7100_misc_intc, "qca,ar7100-misc-intc",
>  		ar7100_misc_intc_of_init);
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ar7240_misc_intc, "qca,ar7240-misc-intc",
> +		ar7240_misc_intc_of_init);

It would be better to keep the same formatting as the surrounding code.
Could you keep the IRQCHIP_DECLARE() together with the init function
and remove the extra blank line?

Alban
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html