From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Simon <horms@verge.net.au>, Magnus <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v3][RFC] arm64: renesas: Add initial r8a7795 SoC support
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:20:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150818002018.31346.63666@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX+edyEWNaSV5d7Knxs8ZjxN7hLPqQgmb+4awNNnfpRDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-08-04 05:34:06)
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart
> <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 03 August 2015 01:53:23 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> >> +/ {
>
> >> + clocks {
> >
> > Let's try to make it right from the start on Gen3. The CPG node should be a
> > direct child of the bus node mentioned above, and the MSTP clocks should be
> > children of the CPG node.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > I'm not sure where to put the non-memory-mapped clocks though, should they be
> > directly under the root node ? It would make sense for extal_clk, but how
> > about the fixed-factor clocks ? Should they be children of the CPG node too ?
>
> I believe the current trend is to put clocks like "extal_clk" under the root
> node.
> As the fixed-factor clocks are generated by the CPG module, and we do have
> a device node for it, I'd make them children of the CPG node, too.
>
> Any comments from the clk+dt experts?
I don't know if anyone is an expert ;-)
extal_clk should be under the root node. That is true for all
board-level clocks and clock controllers.
Within the SoC we want to model the clock controller as a node in DT,
not necessarily all of the individual clocks. So you definitely need a
"cpg" node in DT with #clock-cells > 0.
Whether or not you enumerate the individual clocks in DT is up to you. I
do not like the data-driven approach of putting the clock definition
data into DT. It makes it awkward to do things like set a flag on a
single clock later on. Simply using the clock controller phandle plus
one or more offsets is preferred over a per-clock phandle.
Stephen and I have been discussing what a formal clock-controller
binding would look like, and one item we came up with is that any
sub-nodes of the controller would not be allowed to have a #clock-cells
property.
Also, while you're thinking about the perfect clock binding, please do
consider dropping clock-output-names if you can. Specifying clock-names
alongside the clocks property inside of the consumer node is a bit more
elegant in my opinion. This is also a bit easier if you think about
expressing your clock data with C inside of your provider driver.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Thanks!
>
> >> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >> + ranges;
> >> +
> >> + extal_clk: extal_clk {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + clock-frequency = <0>;
> >> + clock-output-names = "extal";
> >> + };
> >> + cpg_clocks: cpg_clocks@e6150000 {
> >> + compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-cpg-clocks",
> >> + "renesas,rcar-gen3-cpg-clocks";
> >> + reg = <0 0xe6150000 0 0x1000>;
> >> + clocks = <&extal_clk>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + clock-output-names = "main", "pll0", "pll1","pll2",
> >> + "pll3", "pll4";
> >> + };
> >> + p_clk: p_clk {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
> >> + clocks = <&cpg_clocks RCAR_GEN3_CLK_PLL1>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + clock-div = <24>;
> >> + clock-mult = <1>;
> >> + clock-output-names = "p";
> >> + };
> >> + mstp3_clks: mstp3_clks@e615013c {
> >> + compatible = "renesas,r8a7795-mstp-clocks",
> >> + "renesas,cpg-mstp-clocks";
> >> + reg = <0 0xe615013c 0 4>, <0 0xe6150048 0 4>;
> >> + clocks = <&p_clk>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + renesas,clock-indices = <RCAR_GEN3_CLK_IRDA>;
> >> + clock-output-names = "irda";
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +};
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <877fpdw3av.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
[not found] ` <873801w377.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
[not found] ` <1559394.i3FG4v33fI@avalon>
2015-08-04 12:34 ` [PATCH 3/4 v3][RFC] arm64: renesas: Add initial r8a7795 SoC support Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-18 0:20 ` Michael Turquette [this message]
2015-08-19 7:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-19 21:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-08-20 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-20 19:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-08-24 7:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-28 8:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150818002018.31346.63666@quantum \
--to=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).