From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:48:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20150818224831.GA140911@google.com> References: <1439923455-109818-1-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org> <1439923455-109818-2-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org> <51457775.D3ds00ymOJ@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51457775.D3ds00ymOJ@phil> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Brian Norris , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Alexandru M Stan , Douglas Anderson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:17:06PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 18. August 2015, 11:44:15 schrieb Brian Norris: > > This DTS file was submitted with non-upstream bindings. I happened > > across this while reviewing the jaq DTS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris > > Cc: Alexandru M Stan > > Cc: Douglas Anderson > > --- > > Tested on jaq, not minnie > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts index > > 0e30bd6bf92b..6f619c154dc6 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-minnie.dts > > @@ -128,12 +128,16 @@ > > regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; > > regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; > > regulator-name = "vcc33_touch"; > > - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled; > > + regulator-state-mem { > > + regulator-on-in-suspend; > > + }; > > }; > > > > vcc5v_touch: SWITCH_REG2 { > > regulator-name = "vcc5v_touch"; > > - regulator-suspend-mem-disabled; > > + regulator-state-mem { > > + regulator-on-in-suspend; > > + }; > > wouldn't regulator-suspend-mem-disabled translate to regulator-off-in-suspend? > At least looks like it according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/592 You are right. My bad. Will fix. (Need to fix this in jaq too.) Thanks, Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html