From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/3 v6] Add Mediatek MT8173 cpufreq driver Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:46:59 +0530 Message-ID: <20150826021659.GD8784@linux> References: <1439803465-19683-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <1617873.VRHfat3V76@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pi-Cheng Chen Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthias Brugger , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 26-08-15, 09:25, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > The [3/3] is based on Mediatek SoC maintainer tree[1] and the patch which > introduce a new clock type[2] consumed by MT8173 cpufreq driver. So it will > cause some conflicts if it goes through your tree. I am not sure how this > should be handled, but should it be merged through Mediatek SoC maintainer > tree? Just get that applied to MTK tree, it doesn't have any dependency on rest of the patches for build/boot. The only thing is that cpufreq wouldn't work and it will work as soon as Rafael's and MTK's trees are merged by Linus. -- viresh