From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: fixed using uninitialized variable warnings
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:04:56 +0800
Message-ID: <20150914040456.GA21102@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
References: <1441790182-20248-1-git-send-email-Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>
 <20150909140130.GB22909@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <DM2PR03MB5746E6637A2BC5081EC5428FA500@DM2PR03MB574.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <20150911135431.GP8114@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <DM2PR03MB574FA9FAB46F5091AA8746CFA5D0@DM2PR03MB574.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR03MB574FA9FAB46F5091AA8746CFA5D0@DM2PR03MB574.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Yuantian Tang <Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, "hdegoede@redhat.com" <hdegoede@redhat.com>, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Yuantian,

It's cross compiling on ARCH=openrisc.

Thanks,
Fengguang

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:02:27AM +0000, Yuantian Tang wrote:
> Hello Tejun,
> 
> The toolchain I used is:
> gcc version 4.8.3 20140401 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.8-2014.04)
> 
> I have not found this warning using this tool chain with -Wuninitialized flag.
> 
> Regards,
> Yuantian 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tejun Heo [mailto:htejun@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tejun Heo
> > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 9:55 PM
> > To: Tang Yuantian-B29983 <Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>
> > Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Fengguang Wu
> > <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: fixed using uninitialized variable warnings
> > 
> > Hello, Yuantian.
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:27:25AM +0000, Yuantian Tang wrote:
> > > Hi Tejun,
> > >
> > > Could you please take the version 1 patch?
> > > The version 2 patch can't address these warnings, and the version 1 can
> > definitely remove them.
> > > In this case, that would cause any hidden bugs, so no worries.
> > 
> > Ugh... I really hate changes which are made to just work around compiler
> > silliness.  If this is something which goes away with newer gcc, Fengguang can
> > just make it as a known false positive.  Yuantian, which compiler are you
> > using?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > --
> > tejun