From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ST PLL fixes for 4.3-rc2
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:14:49 -0700
Message-ID: <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org>
References: <1442389379-9298-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>
 <20150916223051.GO23081@codeaurora.org>
 <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com>
Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Cc: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>, Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>, Pankaj Dev <pankaj.dev@st.com>, Olivier Bideau <olivier.bideau@st.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>, Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@stlinux.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On 09/17, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/17/2015 12:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 09/16, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
> >>This patch set fixes a kernel crash :
> >[..]
> >>This kernel crash is due to a broken compatibility with this commit:
> >>commit 5eb26c605909 ("ARM: STi: DT: Rename st_pll3200c32_407_c0_x into st_pll3200c32_cx_x")
> >It isn't clear who's supposed to apply this because the To: list
> >is huge. Did you want to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel
> >free to take my acked-by on the second patch. The first patch
> >doesn't even apply to clk tree because the patch introducing the
> >typo didn't go through our tree.
> Indeed Stephen, I see it went through my tree (STi DT).
> So the first patch should be taken through arm-soc.
> The second patch, should be taken through yours I think.
> 

Ok. That probably breaks bisectability, but if you're not
worried, I'm not worried.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project