From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] clk: shmobile: mstp: Consider "zb_clk" suitable for power management Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:24:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20150917222454.GW23081@codeaurora.org> References: <1438691297-29235-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1438691297-29235-16-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150917084446.GA8197@verge.net.au> <20150917085314.GA29509@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150917085314.GA29509@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Michael Turquette , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Laurent Pinchart , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/17, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:45:18PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Mike, Hi Stephen, > > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > Currently the CPG/MSTP Clock Domain code looks for MSTP clocks to power > > > manage a device. > > > > > > Unfortunately, on R-Mobile APE6 (r8a73a4) and SH-Mobile AG5 (sh73a0), > > > the Bus State Controller (BSC) is not power-managed by an MSTP clock, > > > but by a plain CPG clock (zb_clk). Add a special case to handle this, > > > so the clock is properly managed, and devices connected to the BSC work > > > as expected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson > > > > for one reason or another I seem to have this patch queued up in > > my renesas tree for v4.4, without any Acks. > > > > I think it would be best if one of you took the patch instead. > > Though I'm also happy to take it with Acks. > > > > Let me know how you would like to proceed. > > Sorry to revise the above, I should have checked more closely > before I sent my previous email. I now see that I have an SoC patch > that depends on this one. So if possible I'd like to take this one > through my tree with an Ack or two. > Sure. Acked-by: Stephen Boyd -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project