From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com
Cc: ddaney.cavm@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, david.daney@cavium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio-octeon: Add PCI driver binding.
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:14:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150924.151451.1059470233561232912.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56047367.3060101@caviumnetworks.com>
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:04:23 -0700
> On 09/24/2015 02:52 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:41:36 -0700
>>
>>> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>>>
>>> When the Cavium mdio-octeon devices appear in the Thunder family of
>>> arm64 based SoCs, they show up as PCI devices. Add PCI driver
>>> wrapping so the driver is bound in the standard PCI device scan.
>>>
>>> When in this form, a single PCI device may have more than a single
>>> bus, we call this a "nexus" of buses. The standard firmware
>>> device_for_each_child_node() iterator is used to find the individual
>>> buses underneath the "nexus".
>>>
>>> Update the device tree binding documentation for the new PCI driver
>>> binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>>
>> This patch breaks the build:
>
> For which architecture?
>
> I tested it on mips and arm64. I will try x86, as I guess that is
> where you tried your test build.
x86-64.
> There is, somewhat of, a method behind the madness here.
>
> In order to use MSI-X interrupts, we need a corresponding PCI
> device. Now, this driver doesn't currently use interrupts, but other
> devices in the SoC do, so they must be PCI devices.
"I need this thing, which isn't needed, therefore I'm making this
change."
Sorry, that's not a good argument.
ACPI nodes have names and whatnot as well.
So I haven't heard a compelling argument so far.
So why not just implement this cleanly and using the existing
framework now, and then when you have a legitimate reason for making a
major change to the probing scheme you can do it then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 0:41 [PATCH] net: mdio-octeon: Add PCI driver binding David Daney
[not found] ` <1442968896-30776-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-24 21:52 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 22:04 ` David Daney
[not found] ` <56047367.3060101-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-24 22:12 ` David Daney
2015-09-24 22:16 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 22:14 ` David Miller [this message]
[not found] ` <20150924.151451.1059470233561232912.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-24 22:45 ` David Daney
2015-09-24 22:50 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 22:54 ` David Daney
2015-09-24 23:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150924.151451.1059470233561232912.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).