From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] arm64, numa, dt: adding dt based numa support using dt node property arm, associativity Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:18:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20151009151850.GX17192@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1439570374-4079-1-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> <1439570374-4079-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1439570374-4079-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Will.Deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, rfranz-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, steve.capper-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, al.stone-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, gpkulkarni-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:09:33PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > Adding dt node pasring for numa topology using property arm,associativity. > arm,associativity property can be used to map memory, cpu and > io devices to numa node. > > Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 + > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 7 + > arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm64/kernel/dt_numa.c | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 1 + > arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 13 ++ Since a lot of code here is very similar to powerpc, any chance of making it common, especially if we try to use the same bindings (maybe with a different prefix ("arm," vs "ibm,")? See https://members.openpowerfoundation.org/document/dl/469. Also, since this series is from August, any chance to post another and incorporate the feedback provided so far? -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html