From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] devicetree: add binding for generic mmio clocksource Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:01:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20151010000118.GV26883@codeaurora.org> References: <1444232234-2133-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <20151007154727.GC28981@leverpostej> <20151009184632.GR26883@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/09, M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd wrote: > Stephen Boyd writes: > > > > Does that mean a flag day? Urgh. Pain. I'm not opposed to adding > > a pointer, in fact it might be better for performance so that we > > don't take a cache miss in read() functions that need to load > > some pointer. We were talking about that problem a few months > > ago, but nothing came of it. >=20 > I've sent a patch. Let the flames begin. >=20 I never got it. Was I Cced? --=20 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project