From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kbuild test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/25] scsi: hisi_sas: add dev_found and port_formed Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:35:11 +0800 Message-ID: <201510130610.OHuS0tt3%fengguang.wu@intel.com> References: <1444663237-238302-17-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1444663237-238302-17-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linuxarm@huawei.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, xuwei5@hisilicon.com, john.garry2@mail.dcu.ie, hare@suse.de, John Garry List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi John, [auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/John-Garry/HiSilicon-SAS-driver/20151012-231929 reproduce: # apt-get install sparse make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c:321:6: sparse: symbol 'hisi_sas_bytes_dmaed' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c:358:24: sparse: symbol 'hisi_sas_alloc_dev' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c:376:5: sparse: symbol 'hisi_sas_dev_found_notify' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c:479:6: sparse: symbol 'hisi_sas_port_notify_formed' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c:428:9: sparse: context imbalance in 'hisi_sas_dev_found_notify' - different lock contexts for basic block >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c:479:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'hisi_sas_port_notify_formed' - different lock contexts for basic block -- >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] val drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: got restricted __le64 [usertype] sas_addr >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:26: sparse: cast from restricted __le64 >> drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:24: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:24: expected restricted __le64 [usertype] sas_addr drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:528:24: got unsigned long long drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:733:6: sparse: symbol 'enable_phy_v1_hw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1014:36: sparse: cast from restricted __le32 drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1014:36: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1014:36: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] dma_err_type drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1014:36: got restricted __le32 [usertype] drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1022:33: sparse: cast from restricted __le32 drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1022:33: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1022:33: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] trans_tx_fail_type drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1022:33: got restricted __le32 [usertype] drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1024:33: sparse: cast from restricted __le32 drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1024:33: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1024:33: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] trans_rx_fail_type drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1024:33: got restricted __le32 [usertype] drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1120:5: sparse: symbol 'slot_complete_v1_hw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1374:34: sparse: cast from restricted __le32 drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1374:32: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1374:32: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] cmplt_hdr_data drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:1374:32: got restricted __le32 [usertype] Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation