From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:26:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20151020172654.GC4943@leverpostej> References: <1445282597-18999-1-git-send-email-brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com> <20151019205236.GB453@leverpostej> <56266F7E.6030404@amd.com> <20151020165744.GE31130@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151020165744.GE31130-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brijesh Singh , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-edac-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, dougthompson-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:57:44PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:44:46AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > > This second property doesn't describe the hardware in any way. It should > > > be runtime-configurable and dpesn't belong in the DT. > > > > > > Regardless, the binding is wrong. This is in no way specific to AMD > > > Seattle, and per the code is actually used to imply the presence of a > > > Cortex-A57 feature. No reference to AMD Seattle belongs in the DT > > > binding (with the exception of the example, perhaps), nor in the driver. > > > > > > NAK while this pretends to be something that it isn't. At minimum, you > > > need to correctly describe the feature you are trying to add support > > > for. > > > > > I will remove AMD specific string in compatibility field and make > > the poll-delay-msec optional. Will also expose this as module > > parameter as you suggested below. > > Btw, how much of this is implementing generic A57 functionality? The driver is entirely A57 generic. > If a lot, can we make this a generic a57_edac driver so that multiple > vendors can use it? Yes. > How fast and how ugly can something like that become? Not sure I follow. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html