From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
dougthompson@xmission.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020173639.GH31130@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151020172654.GC4943@leverpostej>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:26:55PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Btw, how much of this is implementing generic A57 functionality?
>
> The driver is entirely A57 generic.
>
> > If a lot, can we make this a generic a57_edac driver so that multiple
> > vendors can use it?
>
> Yes.
Ok, cool.
> > How fast and how ugly can something like that become?
>
> Not sure I follow.
In the sense that some vendor might require just a little bit different
handling or maybe wants to read some vendor-specific registers in
addition to the architectural ones.
Then we'll start adding vendor-specific hacks to that generic driver.
And therefore the question how fast and how ugly such hacks would
become.
I guess we'll worry about that when we get there...
So Brijesh, if you only need generic, architectural functionality,
please call it arm64_edac or so and let's add it so that other arm64
vendors can use it too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1445282597-18999-1-git-send-email-brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com>
2015-10-19 20:52 ` [PATCH] EDAC: Add AMD Seattle SoC EDAC Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 16:44 ` Brijesh Singh
[not found] ` <56266F7E.6030404-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-20 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20151020165744.GE31130-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-20 17:26 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 17:36 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
[not found] ` <20151020173639.GH31130-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-20 17:41 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-20 19:16 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-21 1:55 ` Hanjun Guo
[not found] ` <5626F09F.4050107-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-21 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20151021093536.GA3575-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-21 10:01 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-21 16:22 ` Brijesh Singh
2015-10-23 1:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-10-20 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-21 1:45 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151020173639.GH31130@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).