From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jisheng Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: berlin: bg2q: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag for sdio clk Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:08:56 +0800 Message-ID: <20151021180856.217e11ea@xhacker> References: <1445339807-2351-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com> <1445339807-2351-4-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com> <20151021093039.20687.88701@quantum> <20151021095454.20687.98330@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151021095454.20687.98330@quantum> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Turquette Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Michael, On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 02:54:54 -0700 Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Michael Turquette (2015-10-21 02:30:39) > > Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2015-10-20 04:16:46) > > > Since we have added the necessary two clks' properties in dts, we can > > > remove the "sdio" clk's CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag now. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > > > Applied to clk-next. > > So the sdhci change was dropped from v2. Do you want me to Ack these > instead so you can send them all together? I'll send another patch to for the sdhci change. it doesn't matter even the sdhci change delay a merge window because no functionality changes in the sdhci commit. It's better we firstly take these clk clean ups because it saves power a bit and clean up the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag. Hi Sebastian, What do you think? Thanks, Jisheng