From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:04:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20151022000452.GU19782@codeaurora.org> References: <1444938513-10758-1-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com> <1444938513-10758-8-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1444938513-10758-8-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Mason Cc: Michael Turquette , Florian Fainelli , Hauke Mehrtens , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/15, Jon Mason wrote: > Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. The means the > pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can > specify device tree registers for those independently. Also, add a new > driver flag to identify this presence of the split, and let the driver > know that additional registers need to be used. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason > --- Applied to clk-iproc -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project