From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] i2c: uniphier: add two I2C controller drivers for UniPhier SoC platform Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:35:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20151026083541.GB3041@katana> References: <1445597520-6299-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20151026081746.GC597@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Lee Jones , Linux I2C , Jiri Slaby , Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel , Kumar Gala , Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , James Hogan , Kamal Dasu , Neelesh Gupta , Geert Uytterhoeven , Ray Jui , Tejun Heo , Andrew Bresticker , Scott Branden , Javier Martinez Canillas , Pawel Moll , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Xudong Chen List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:31:15AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: > > 2015-10-26 17:17 GMT+09:00 Lee Jones : > >>> This series adds two I2C controller drivers. > >>> (they are completely different IPs.) > >>> > >>> The first one is a very simple FIFO-less I2C controller, > >>> which is used on some older UniPhier SoCs. > >>> > >>> The other one is higher-performance I2C controller with TX/RX FIFO, > >>> used on newer UniPhier SoCs. > >> > >> And you have sent this to me because ... ? > > > > > > No special reason. > > > > > > I sent this series to linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org. > > > > I guess you were automatically CC'ed by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. > > > > Using get_maintainer.pl is a normal process when sending patches, I thi= nk. >=20 > Please use common sense. It doesn't make much sense to CC everybody who > ever made a minor edit to an affected file. >=20 > If checkpatch comes up with more than 5 names, this should ring a bell. I usually use get_maintainer.pl with --no-git-fallback to catch people listed in MAINTAINERS only. But mileages vary a lot in that area. --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWLeXdAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2ZQYP/1CtX3DoCZR8Vx9phfpi1dIQ v7Yre25PLXD8l7xt67A8W9wTB5xgzoHht6p8UAT5Bvw/EPX7O1S8vW6nEgsUI/4L SoTWtwkSQXp0YYgjvU02sbTk5+o4AVMoiBj/tW7QJaCSfqrb2C5Mzca2Ho+mwqpv jZWbtVUkmedUfprVzlEXWKCNGAwtptn3mH4p9YwASgYYbL/u1lkPECRvNO9rg6bT /9JOyPMZecdz62X0XKWzZaDwl1mSBe+U24CF4DYhubIHxUOxjveA4UarGk+zCcFU fPCLJdRoNCIkqzwKzr9aoo2y4/hX/KGFZM5pozB4+ejqcPD415WZfywldwxAtgGv Ri4oZheG7FR50DWN6DhWiBGeeD0M95A614X3Jf107qO/dUkK7bPab7blIqS8OsyR U1yOlNBx0Y2LdG1T7F9pmEtUPswEYyyhwry+vNJieAFAAJ+GqrKN4jiQFZ8vXj4m ZLUX7kBxZ9ffWiz0DrNvxnl0wk4wt5NU5ra8k5G9DSsod65toUaTKwPHgd+1habO qPekDvtAOGQMWRgwoFKx8FLAw8Ec/pkwMdDNEZR+0hVcKnXoDFYEovVIyxlCkfh5 0ZEnjO5x0a0xRzgiyJHCEYpkZIR8RmhWcFZDj1Mb39RazQdM+brPUrS8zxZX5zp+ 2bcu/2Y14Z6jvrMxowlX =ENLE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd--