public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
Cc: robherring2@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	pebolle@tiscali.nl, hch@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com,
	linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org, subhashj@codeaurora.org,
	gbroner@codeaurora.org, draviv@codeaurora.org,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@gmail.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@odin.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] scsi: ufs: add option to change default UFS power management level
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:39:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151112173942.GA1369@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445874072-25909-3-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 05:40:57PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> UFS device and link can be put in multiple different low power modes
> hence UFS driver supports multiple different low power modes.
> By default UFS driver selects the default (optimal) low power mode
> (which gives moderate power savings and have relatively less enter
> and exit latencies) but we might have to tune this default power
> mode for different chipset platforms to meet the low power
> requirements/goals. Hence this patch adds option to change default
> UFS low power mode (level).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
> 
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt      |  8 +++++
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.c                   | 17 +++++++++-
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c                          | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h                          |  4 +--
>  4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> index 9fea0de..b7db1c9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt
> @@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ Optional properties:
>  			  defined or a value in the array is "0" then it is assumed
>  			  that the frequency is set by the parent clock or a
>  			  fixed rate clock source.
> +- rpm-level		: UFS Runtime power management level. Following PM levels are supported:
> +			  0 - Both UFS device and Link in active state (Highest power consumption)
> +			  1 - UFS device in active state but Link in Hibern8 state
> +			  2 - UFS device in Sleep state but Link in active state
> +			  3 - UFS device in Sleep state and Link in hibern8 state (default PM level)
> +			  4 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in Hibern8 state
> +			  5 - UFS device in Power-down state and Link in OFF state (Lowest power consumption)
> +- spm-level		: UFS System power management level. Allowed PM levels are same as rpm-level.

These seem too Linux specific. What would make them different for 
runtime-PM vs. system suspend? Power mgmt capabilities in the kernel 
change over time (and vary by OS), so you don't want to encode them into 
DT. I would probably define separately what modes the phy supports and 
the device supports. 

Isn't hibern8 required by the MPHY or UniPro spec? If so, that should be 
assumed to be supported and then have a quirk property to flag it as 
broken.

Rob

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1445874072-25909-1-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org>
2015-10-26 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] scsi: ufs-qcom: add number of lanes per direction Yaniv Gardi
     [not found] ` <1445874072-25909-1-git-send-email-ygardi-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-26 15:40   ` [PATCH v2 02/17] scsi: ufs: add option to change default UFS power management level Yaniv Gardi
2015-11-12 17:39     ` Rob Herring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151112173942.GA1369@rob-hp-laptop \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=draviv@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gbroner@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=santoshsy@gmail.com \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
    --cc=ygardi@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox