Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: Broadcom BCM63138 support

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>]

On 11/20, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 20/11/15 10:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 11/19, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 19/11/15 17:00, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>> On 29/10/15 18:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>> This patch series adds support for the Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoCs
> >>>> clocking framework.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since the HW is identical to the one found in Broadcom iProc SoCs, but the
> >>>> integration is different (obviously), there is still a new compatible string
> >>>> introduced just in case we happen to find issues in the future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Stephen, could you stage the two patches in a clk-bcm63xx branch that I could
> >>>> later utilize while doing the arm-soc DT pull request?
> >>>
> >>> Stephen, can you queue the first two patches in a topic branch for me to
> >>> merge as part of the commit adding the DTS changes?
> >>
> >> Well, now that I look back at the changes, you can actually merge the
> >> two patches in clk-next, and the DTS changes can come in before or
> >> after, it does not really matter, this would not cause breakage or
> >> anything. Sorry for the noise.
> > 
> > Really? I thought if the clk patches aren't there then the dts
> > change would cause some clocks to be orphaned. If that's ok with
> > you it's ok with me.
> 
> Woah, I guess I was not thinking very clearly yesterday, yes, we need to
> bundle these changes together, so if you are still okay with the topic
> branch for me to include as a merge commit, that's fine with me as well.

Ok. Done.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project