From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: dawei chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu dynamic power cooling model.
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:00:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130093042.GA8556@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448875581.29031.14.camel@mtksdaap41>
On 30-11-15, 17:26, dawei chien wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 11:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 27-11-15, 17:32, Dawei Chien wrote:
> > > MT8173 cpufreq driver use of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register registering
> > > cooling devices with dynamic power coefficient.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dawei Chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > This patch is base on patchset:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/17/251
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> > > index 83001dc..4d39468 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> > > @@ -263,24 +263,34 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#define DYNAMIC_POWER "dynamic-power-coefficient"
> > > +
> > > static void mtk_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > {
> > > struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
> > > struct device_node *np = of_node_get(info->cpu_dev->of_node);
> > > + u32 capacitance;
> > >
> > > if (WARN_ON(!np))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) {
> > > - info->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(np,
> > > - policy->related_cpus);
> > > + if (!info->cdev) {
> >
> > Why will info->cdev be non-NULL here ?
>
> This is a error-checking to avoid user or any script by command line hotplug CPU
> more than two times, we don't need to register cooling device on this case.
Why?
> I will remove it if you don't agree it.
No, my agreeing or not doesn't matter. If what you are doing is useful
(and I am not able to understand it), then you should make me
understand that and don't change your code.
But, I really do not get the reasoning behind the logic. Please
elaborate that step by step.
> > > @@ -460,7 +470,9 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > {
> > > struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
> > >
> > > - cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev);
> > > + if (info->cdev)
> > > + cpufreq_cooling_unregister(info->cdev);
> > > +
> >
> > Why do you need to update this?
>
> This is a error-checking to avoid user or any script by command line
> unplug CPU more than two times, we don't need to unregister cooling
> device on this case.
>
> I will remove it if you don't agree it.
Same here.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-27 9:32 [PATCH v4 0/3] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu power cooling model Dawei Chien
[not found] ` <1448616727-29367-1-git-send-email-dawei.chien-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-27 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add thermal zone node Dawei Chien
2015-11-27 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] thermal: mediatek: Add cpu dynamic power cooling model Dawei Chien
2015-11-30 5:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-30 9:26 ` dawei chien
2015-11-30 9:30 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-11-30 10:21 ` dawei chien
2015-11-30 10:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-30 12:16 ` dawei chien
2015-11-27 9:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add dynamic power node Dawei Chien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151130093042.GA8556@ubuntu \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dawei.chien@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).